Welcome to the KDE Community Forums, the official forum board for KDE.
You are currently viewing the forums as an unregistered user. Registration allows you to post and discuss topics, receive private messages, vote on ideas, subscribe to topics and many such great features. Registration is a simple process and completely free. So register now and be a part of the community!
You are currently viewing the forums as an unregistered user. Registration allows you to post and discuss topics, receive private messages, vote on ideas, subscribe to topics and many such great features. Registration is a simple process and completely free. So register now and be a part of the community!
KControl port
45 posts
• Page 1 of 3
• 1, 2, 3
KControl port
Hi, i've compiled and tested almost every version of KDE4 (from 4.0.1 to 4.1.3), and i feel unconfortable with systemsettings. There's no way to have KControl, which is far more usable, ported to KDE4?
RE: KControl port
I already took a look at it. And it is not so hard to implement, because most of the parts are already there. You just have to switch the list view into a tree view and display the configuration pages right beside it. But I ran in some problems. I will definitvely have a look at it for the KDE 4.3 release or as a standalone application for kde-apps.org. Is anyone out there, who is also working on it or interested?
[size=x-small]code | [url=cia.vc/stats/author/msoeken]cia.vc[/url] | [url=kde.org/support]donating KDE[/url] | [url=tinyurl.com/cto4ns]wishlist[/url][/size]
RE: KControl port
I could lend a hand msoeken. Now that my Solid Actions KControl Module is nearly finished ( some final testing then to kdereview )
System Settings and Device Actions KCM maintainer


RE: KControl port
Definitely Kcontrol is better! I confirm, agree, and REQUEST
, to port Kcontrol to KDE 4.2 as soon as posible! Default sistem settings are at least ugly... as ubuntu:-@
Kcontrol is best I allways used it.
, to port Kcontrol to KDE 4.2 as soon as posible! Default sistem settings are at least ugly... as ubuntu:-@Kcontrol is best I allways used it.
RE: KControl port
I would like to see KControl back, it's far easier to use than the OSX copy that the kubuntu guys has forced us to use. Sadly my skills in QT suxx, otherwise I would gladly help.
RE: KControl port
Ok, think I have some code for the tree view model. I will check this into trunk/playground soon.
[size=x-small]code | [url=cia.vc/stats/author/msoeken]cia.vc[/url] | [url=kde.org/support]donating KDE[/url] | [url=tinyurl.com/cto4ns]wishlist[/url][/size]
RE: KControl port
@msoeken:
Are we talking about a port of KControl, or a tree view in System Settings? I think you mentioned that you might try the latter, or maybe I'm mixing you up with someone else.
I would be interested, but don't think I have enough C++/Qt skills. This summer I'm going to study both like mad! However, that's probably too late for 4.3. ^.-
By the way, after using System Settings for a bit, I actually don't hate it as much as I initially did.
By the way 2, wasn't KControl always considered "messy", "hard to navigate", "confusing to new users" etc. in KDE3?
Are we talking about a port of KControl, or a tree view in System Settings? I think you mentioned that you might try the latter, or maybe I'm mixing you up with someone else.
I would be interested, but don't think I have enough C++/Qt skills. This summer I'm going to study both like mad! However, that's probably too late for 4.3. ^.-
By the way, after using System Settings for a bit, I actually don't hate it as much as I initially did.
By the way 2, wasn't KControl always considered "messy", "hard to navigate", "confusing to new users" etc. in KDE3?
Problem solved? Please click on
below the post with the best answer to mark your topic as solved.

10 things you might want to do in KDE | Plasma HowTo | Mouse shortcuts
below the post with the best answer to mark your topic as solved.10 things you might want to do in KDE | Plasma HowTo | Mouse shortcuts
RE: KControl port
I don't know if it was like that, but something that was thought as messy was the Gnome control center, and then they made even worse in Gnome2 which didn't allow users to do what they were used to do and included a dependency that forced you to have metacity installed even if you didn't use it.
I really hope we will have the option to configure things without using a register editor like they do in gnome2 and microsoft windows.
I really hope we will have the option to configure things without using a register editor like they do in gnome2 and microsoft windows.
RE: KControl port
I think integrating a second view into the existing systemsettings, rather than an entirely separate program, may be the better option. Like msoeken said it is essential a sort of two-pane tree view. That means you could just have a button to change between the two views (and perhaps others down the road). I do not think there is any need for a second program.
Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
-NASA in 1965
-NASA in 1965
RE: KControl port
Trizt wrote:I don't know if it was like that, but something that was thought as messy was the Gnome control center, and then they made even worse in Gnome2 which didn't allow users to do what they were used to do and included a dependency that forced you to have metacity installed even if you didn't use it.
I really hope we will have the option to configure things without using a register editor like they do in gnome2 and microsoft windows.
i heard some talk about a graphical tool to modify text-only config file options, essentially the Linux version of a registry front-end like Tweak UI. I know there are a few options in KDE 4.2 that require manually editing a text-file, but these are temporary limitations of experimental features rather than a long-term plan.
Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
-NASA in 1965
-NASA in 1965
RE: KControl port
Yes, I was also thinking about a switch in system settings. System settings is just a wrapper for kcm modules, so most of the work is already implemented, it is just a question about displaying the data.
[size=x-small]code | [url=cia.vc/stats/author/msoeken]cia.vc[/url] | [url=kde.org/support]donating KDE[/url] | [url=tinyurl.com/cto4ns]wishlist[/url][/size]
RE: KControl port
msoeken: Where is the source code for the treeview located in playground?
( I think putting them into the same program would be a good idea, but it would require substantial changes to system settings )
( I think putting them into the same program would be a good idea, but it would require substantial changes to system settings )
System Settings and Device Actions KCM maintainer


RE: KControl port
It is not there now. Hope I remember to commit it after work later in the evening.
[size=x-small]code | [url=cia.vc/stats/author/msoeken]cia.vc[/url] | [url=kde.org/support]donating KDE[/url] | [url=tinyurl.com/cto4ns]wishlist[/url][/size]
RE: KControl port
You can find the source at trunk/playground/base/kcontrol4.
[size=x-small]code | [url=cia.vc/stats/author/msoeken]cia.vc[/url] | [url=kde.org/support]donating KDE[/url] | [url=tinyurl.com/cto4ns]wishlist[/url][/size]
45 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
del.icio.us
|
Digg
|
Google
|
Identi.ca
|
Reddit
|
Slashdot
|
StumbleUpon
|
Technorati
|

Feed
Search
FAQ
Policy
KDE.org
KDE.news
Planet KDE
More 
Kubuntu
openSUSE
aptosid
Linux (Other)
Arch
del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Identi.ca
Reddit
Slashdot
StumbleUpon
Technorati