|
Hi,
I've installed amaroK on KDE 3.2 with Mandrake 10, and can get as far as the splash screen. The command line output of amaroK is thus: [amaroK loader] connecting to /home/xxx/.kde/socket-x1-6-00-d0-09-f7-45-be/amarok.loader_socket [amaroK loader] amaroK not running. Trying to start it.. [amaroK loader] timed out trying to contact amaroK. [amaroK loader] exiting. Of course, x1-6-00-d0-09-f7-45-be does not exist. I only want to run amaroK locally, obviously, so why does it have to connect? Is there a way to make it just look for localhost while I sort out my non-reverse-lookup hostname situation? Thanks. |
|
Also, settting up my hostname to what it SHOULD be, results in:
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Xlib: No protocol specified amarok: cannot connect to X server :0.0 This also happens if I set it to something which is not a hostname, say, blahblahblah. Yet, setting it back to x1-6-00-d0-09-f7-45-be (which does also not exist!) gets a different error, as above. :blink: Will a reinstall of amaroK, after setting hostname realhostnamehere create a socket with the correct hostname, and thus allow it to load that socket and connect to the correct location? I have no control over my hostname until I login by the way. It seems to set itself to x1-6-00-d0-09-f7-45-be on boot. |
KDE Developer
|
Techmonkey wrote:
Start directly by calling "amarokapp".
--
Mark Kretschmann - Amarok Developer |
Alumni
|
We should remove the socket... you agree?
|
|
$ amarokapp
bash: amarokapp: command not found :blink: I'll reinstall. |
KDE Developer
|
mxcl wrote:
Actually.. no. Consider his next posting:
--
Mark Kretschmann - Amarok Developer |
|
Actually, I can't reinstall. I have TagLib 1.0 installed, but make dies on me when I try to make amaroK. It says:
"g++: /usr/lib/libtag.so: No such file or directory" However, in /usr/lib, there are other libtag files, such as libtag.so.1 etc. Why would .so just not be there? |
Alumni
|
True, but I still have an uneasy feeling about the whole loader concept. It's another point of failure. Although I'm starting to think that maybe I'm being silly.
But there is a lot of bug reports where it seems amarok is in the path but amarokapp isn't. |
|
So, what is the common fix to the amarok-not-in-path bug?
|
Registered users: Bing [Bot], gfielding, Google [Bot], markhm, Sogou [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]