Well done, with amarok 1.3 you\'ve really plumbed new depths of flakiness. Is it me, or with eack amarok release does the quality get poorer and poorer?

Instead of **** for the sake of ****, why don\'t you try posting the issues? Your temper tantrum won\'t get you anywhere.

sorry to inform you, but we didn\'t even release a 1.3.

so amarok feels unstable, you say? i guess what you\'re referring to is probably 1.3 BETA1. oh wait... IT SAYS BETA1. hell no. could it be, that beta1 infact just isn\'t meant to be a stable release?

:blink: :blink:

...muesli

That\'s funny. 1.3_beta1 works nice for me...

Keep up the great work. Maybe you should make beta releases idiot proof?

You\'re right. Although my temper tantrum has made me feel much better, thank you very much. And yes, it\'s a beta so perhaps I shouldn\'t expect it to do more than print \"amaroK is crashing\" before bailing. So, now that there are no toys left in my pram, i\'ll try for some more constructive feedback for the devs.

muesli wrote:

sorry to inform you, but we didn\'t even release a 1.3.

so amarok feels unstable, you say? i guess what you\'re referring to is probably 1.3 BETA1. oh wait... IT SAYS BETA1. hell no. could it be, that beta1 infact just isn\'t meant to be a stable release?

:blink: :blink:

Hrm... if beta shouldn\'t be a stable release, then SVN should be much more unstable. Wait... something is wrong with my amaroK... Why do you never crash?!

bak2juk: That\'s the right way!

at least specify the engine you use. and try to get a backtrace for the crash. see wiki / faq for info on enabling debug mode.

have fun,
muesli