|
Hello!
I just played around with amarok 1.4 today and noticed that one band was missing from my collection. The band in question is called "...but alive" and I wonder, if the leading dots, which are present in the directory name where the files are located are responsible for this. Just tested: renaming any directory to "..something" or even ".something" makes it invisible for amarok... Bug or feature? -cord Tested with amarok 1.4, guru-RPMS for SuSE 10.0 x86-64 |
|
a leading dot is the unix way to make a file hidden... so I would call that a feature because normaly you don't want to see hidden-files...
|
|
That would make this a feature of a filemanager (or the file manager tab of amarok). But I don't see why amarok should omit dot-directories when scanning the collection - especially when it *does not* omit filenames with leading dots, I can see AFX's .215061 Track without problems in the collection browser...
-cord |
Registered Member
|
Hi there,
amarok scans the directory the unix way, so it's omitting dotted dirs and files. I think that's ok, because there could be a lot of hidden files in these directories. In my case there are: the .directory for explaining the folder a .folder.png for the icon of the directory and all the files from the moodbar, one per track. It's generally not a good idea to use special chars in filenames. The track with the leading dot is shown up, because its tags has been read by amarok. Greetings m0nk
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
|
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Sogou [Bot]