![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
HELP! 100% sure now Amarok deletes my internal covers..please help..about to cry
Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:52 am
Hi all
After testing it alot i am now 100% sure amarok deletes my internal covers when i edit ID3 tags. I have verified it both with 4 windows based programs and Easy tag in Linux! the problem occurs when i edit a mp3 file (with a image inside the file), no mater what editing you do (even just change a name or add comment) amaroks tag editing deletes the internal cover! i have worked Sooo hard on adding internal covers to my 50,000 MP3 files and i dont want to lose it again. I love amarok and i really dont see any alternative in linux (i really tried all other players...they really dont come close). i really need a great media player for linux and right now i have to use Jriver media player through VMWARE!!!! just to listen to music because im afraid of loosing my tags! I hope it dosent happen only in my computer and if it does im willing to help fix it anyway i can (i dont know any programing though and im pretty new to linux). Ive posted about this a while back but didnt get much response i really would appreciate any help i can get here guys ,without a good media player in Linux i really will break down soon and have to go back to that other OS..yuck... thx alot in advance Zeltak |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Re: HELP! 100% sure now Amarok deletes my internal covers..please help..about to
Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:58 am
Ive just noticed in both easy tag and the windows tagging program Tag and rename that amarok completly wiped out all ID3v2 tags and left only ID3v1 tags after i took some test files and only added the letter "1" to the comment field also deleting the image inside the files as well!
Zeltak |
![]() KDE Developer ![]()
|
Re: HELP! 100% sure now Amarok deletes my internal covers..please help..about to cry
Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:03 am
Amarok does NOT delete any of your tags. Here's what really happens: Amarok writes ID3 V2.4 tags, which some other players can't read, due to outdated tagging libraries. These players can only process ID3 V2.3., hence they don't see the 2.4 tags.
--
Mark Kretschmann - Amarok Developer |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Re: HELP! 100% sure now Amarok deletes my internal covers..please help..about to
Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:20 am
thx for the answer Mark!
I appreciate it. Just to want to make clear that I love amarok and really appreciate all your awesome work, this is by no mean a complaint just a way to find a solution! do you know then of a player capable of reading the new ID3 v2.4 tags so i can test it out and make sure (sorry for being a nag but i really want to make sure of it since i do have a huge collection) and put my worries to an end? thx again Zeltak |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Re: HELP! 100% sure now Amarok deletes my internal covers..please help..about to
Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:58 pm
ok I can confirm that it does not delete my tags YAY!!
![]() ![]() Now i can go back to using Amarok Fulltime. After doing some research today on ID3 V2 tags i said to myself..Wow...this ID3 thing is getting confusing....is this a blue ray Vs H-DVD thing... :wink i really cant understand why there are so many formats to mp3 idv2.. Anyway, one related question...why dosent amarok use the built in cover? i wanted to ask the same about the built in lyrics but saw to day that someone made a plugin for that: http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=49274 Thx again Zeltak |
![]() Moderator ![]()
|
Re: HELP! 100% sure now Amarok deletes my internal covers..please help..about to cry
Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:31 pm
it uses embedded images here. Perhaps you have a cached copy of another cover associated with your albums?
Try deleting/backing up ~/.kde/share/apps/amarok/albumcovers and rescanning your collection. That should refresh the image cache. Of course it will also mean any covers you've fetched from amazon will be gone ![]() Alternatively, you could browse that dir in a gui file manager, and delete any covers you find that shouldn't be there.
"There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works."
. If men could get pregnant, we'd learn the true meaning of "screaming nancyboy wuss" |
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], kde-naveen, Sogou [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]