![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Hello, I have a few thousand songs, and my collection has been building for two hours now and is at 25%. Amarok is using max 0.5% of cpu, and I hardly ever see the hard drive light come on. However, the progress bar is slowly inching forwards. Why is it being so lazy?
|
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
I too am experiencing this problem....
I'm using mySQL with 1.4.9.1 on Ubuntu 8.04 Any ideas? |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Hi all,
I have exactly the same issue since I upgraded Amarok to 1.4.9.1. I'm using the official packages of Debian Testing. Does anyone have any hints on what's going on? |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
This may or may not be an issue, but if you guys are using databases on separate servers over wi-fi connections that might be the problem. I have about 8k songs and (see my other thread that I bumped here: http://amarok.kde.org/forum/index.php/topic,14813.0.html ) when I was trying to rebuild it from scratch over wifi it would take an eternity. Like, 2 hours to get to about 20%. Plugged 'er in to plain 'ol ethernet and it went along like normal. No CPU usage worth mentioning while trying to do it over wi-fi, either, but over wired it uses a steady 20-30% of my laptop's 1.6ghz/800fsb c2d. I have B wireless here but I can't believe bandwidth was the problem...the server is plenty fast enough for this application, too.
I could be totally off my rocker, too, because what are the chances that all you guys are on wifi LANs and are running mysql on separate boxes? |
![]() KDE Developer ![]()
|
Remote scans are going to be quite slow. I suspect it's the issue with the other two. For some MP3s and other types, taglib has to read the whole file to find the data.
Amarok Developer
|
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
My problem was present with a local collection, so remote shares were not the source of it. Anyway, it disappeared yesterday after a package upgrade: now amarok has returned to be as responsive as usual. I am not completely sure, but I think that it was solved by an upgrade of the sqlite shared library.
So, I0m thinking that it was not an amarok problem, but a distribution issue. |
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], kde-naveen, Sogou [Bot]