Dan wrote:

Want want want.

I want a pony

if its that easy to implement,
show code or don\'t show your face again!

Do you actually want me to respond to the ravings of a 4 year old?

There are enough options already, and nobody likes a huge configuration dialog.

madpenguin8 wrote:

There are enough options already, and nobody likes a huge configuration dialog.

Ok, so there should never be any more options in the dialog. Good call. Obviously based on a vast knowledge of programming UIs.

The difference between now and adding an option or two is "Huge"? Then it must already be bloated.

Do you have anything remotely useful to add?

We can exchange trollisms much faster if you would just get on irc.

Well, I think we can dial back the flame-war a bit, I don\'t think I intended it to escalate. My point was smply, that there is a fundamental design difference between juK and amaroK which may never be reconciled.

oggb4mp3 wrote:

Well, I think we can dial back the flame-war a bit, I don\'t think I intended it to escalate. My point was smply, that there is a fundamental design difference between juK and amaroK which may never be reconciled.

It\'s hilarious how easily some people rise to fight about simple suggestions. I guess having this discussion in a public forum without the people who are writing the code is a bit wasted.