This forum has been archived. All content is frozen. Please use KDE Discuss instead.

amarok, the way

Tags: None
(comma "," separated)
seleko
Registered Member
Posts
3
Karma
0

amarok, the way

Tue Mar 16, 2010 11:46 am
I'm really surprised with the way of development...
Each version, beta or release, we're offered new control bar, play window features visual mixing and appearing or disappearing...
Each time user have no opportunity to return visual appearance that is just started to become familiar.

Let me to remind, that all this happens same time that we still lacking basic functionality (CUE for example).
Am I only one, who think that visual design is not main part of player?

Sure, developers can take it on their own and go even further in experiments with visual designing but what it made for? Just for fun?

hope on understanding.
User avatar
markey
KDE Developer
Posts
2286
Karma
3
OS

Re: amarok, the way

Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:55 pm
seleko wrote:I'm really surprised with the way of development...
Sure, developers can take it on their own and go even further in experiments with visual designing but what it made for? Just for fun?

Absolutely not "just for fun", I can guarantee you that. We are simply trying to find the best possible interface, and that requires being innovative, and doing radical changes at times.

However, with things like the new toolbar in 2.3, we have finally reached the look that we desired, so you can expect to it stay. We were simply not happy with all earlier attempts (this is very difficult to design), and so it took some time to find the best concept.

We like to offer optimal solutions, and not just something half-assed, you see. And this requires a lot of work and experimentation :)


--
Mark Kretschmann - Amarok Developer
seleko
Registered Member
Posts
3
Karma
0

Re: amarok, the way

Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:52 pm
I appreciate your response, but, please, let user to decide what look is acceptable.
Why not realize skin infrastructure and let other (not so tech-skilled community) to play with it?
It may be very useful for developer too, as allow spend more time for coding and implementing things that not yet done:)
User avatar
Mamarok
Manager
Posts
6071
Karma
16
OS

Re: amarok, the way

Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:34 pm
JFYI: Amarok is skinable, please search this forum, it has been discussed before.


Running Kubuntu 22.10 with Plasma 5.26.3, Frameworks 5.100.0, Qt 5.15.6, kernel 5.19.0-23 on Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Renoir, X11
FWIW: it's always useful to state the exact Plasma version (+ distribution) when asking questions, makes it easier to help ...
User avatar
ivan
KDE Developer
Posts
918
Karma
14
OS

Re: amarok, the way

Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:01 pm
@Mamarok

I don't think seleko meant changing the colours or icons, but rather the layout via skins.


Image
User avatar
Mamarok
Manager
Posts
6071
Karma
16
OS

Re: amarok, the way  Topic is solved

Tue Mar 16, 2010 8:24 pm
ivan wrote:@Mamarok

I don't think seleko meant changing the colours or icons, but rather the layout via skins.

Right, but please have a look at this thread nonetheless: viewtopic.php?f=123&t=74093&start=0&hilit=lfranchi

Changing the layout is extensively possible already, all existing elements can be moved, stack on top or over each other using Tabs and even completely removed.
Ditto for the playlist, there is a PlaylistLayoutEditor that allows considerable changes. Please see also these threads:
viewtopic.php?f=121&t=86115&p=151234&hilit=freespirit#p149165
viewtopic.php?f=116&t=84268&start=0&hilit=Layout+amarok+editor

I really don't think Amarok lacks customisation options currently :)


Running Kubuntu 22.10 with Plasma 5.26.3, Frameworks 5.100.0, Qt 5.15.6, kernel 5.19.0-23 on Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Renoir, X11
FWIW: it's always useful to state the exact Plasma version (+ distribution) when asking questions, makes it easier to help ...
seleko
Registered Member
Posts
3
Karma
0

Re: amarok, the way

Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:11 am
thank you for response


Bookmarks



Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], gfielding, Google [Bot], markhm, Sogou [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]