Deevad wrote:@tubwoo ; the problem with your feedback and her video is you both expect Krita to be a clone of something you already know because you both can't adapt to learn something new. You are welcome to contribute but your message is not the right way to start...

Totally agree!!! I'm using image processing software some decades ago. I tried Corel Paint, PhotoShop and when GIMP born, I tried it too. Adobe software always have had a big lack: Customization. While on Corel you always were able to change any toolbar or menu, Adobe always have had a monolithic interface. That's very good for users that even doesn't know how to configure their tools and are lost if a icon changes position on their desktops. But there are a lot of users like me that run away from Adobe software for those reasons. If you have an open mind, you can adapt quickly to any interface, without needing to be similar to PS.

I use Krita and GIMP (they are complementary for me nowadays, cause GIMP is faster, but Krita have functionalities that do not exist in GIMP) and for me is not a headache to work with distinct UI and toolbars. So I agree with you. Krita doesn't need follow PS rules.

Hello. I've only recently gotten back into Krita because my old PC couldn't handle the work anymore. But as a previous Photoshop user I must say that I don't want photo editing features in an illustration software. We are far from the old days. Back then a touch-up artist needed brushes - or airbrush - and dyes to fix up a print. The medium involved was very limited. Whatever Photoshop has become now it was never a comprehensive illustration program.