![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() Global Moderator ![]()
|
Yep, I believe Chakra is nice - same goes for Sabayon. I was wondering whether I should give Chakra a virtual spin but I cannot get myself to give up my Arch install until it is at least ten years old
![]()
Debian testing
|
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Chakra is a very nice distro. Some features are very interesting, as "bundles"
![]() ![]() |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
I agree with Chaosphere, chakra is a very nice distro. I am currently triple booting slack (my favorite), chakra, and good old ubuntu.
|
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
|
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
|
![]() Manager ![]()
|
Well, Kubuntu it is for me since 2005. It is in my experience the distro where you can have a direct link to the developers and be heard. It is also quite close to vanilla KDE, provides all -dev and -dbg packages as well as the latest upstream releases in the backports PPA.
I have gone through a lot of distros shipping KDE and every now and then try a new one on my old laptop, but I always came back to Kubuntu. My KDE (and Linux) curriculum since 1999: Red Hat - SuSE - Mandrake - Debian - Kubuntu Tried distros: Fedora, OpenSuSE, Mandrake, Mepis, Gentoo, Mint, Arch, Chakra (in no particular order)
Running Kubuntu 22.10 with Plasma 5.26.3, Frameworks 5.100.0, Qt 5.15.6, kernel 5.19.0-23 on Ryzen 5 4600H, AMD Renoir, X11
FWIW: it's always useful to state the exact Plasma version (+ distribution) when asking questions, makes it easier to help ... |
![]() ![]()
|
I voted for Kubuntu as it's the only one that I've used apart from a few runs of the OpenSUSE live CD which wouldn't install when I decided that I would give it a try on a spare hard drive.
I currently have Kubuntu 11.04, 11.10 and 12.04 installed. ![]() |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Sabayon. They test and provide the newest builds possible, so I could enjoy KDE's new trends and implementations.
I also use KDE under Windows 7 64 bit. I am KDE addicted ![]() |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Arch Linux.
![]() I tried a few distributions with KDE, the worst I've came across is openSUSE for me (incredible slow even with proprietary drivers). Kubuntu was OK, but I dunno, I don't like Ubuntu in general. Arch brings just everything I need and is super efficient. I can't think of any other distro. |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
I used KDE with Arch Linux and recently tried OpenSuse and I think of all the distro's I have tried so far for KDE(Kubuntu, ArchLinux, Chakra, Fedora,Mint) I liked OpenSuse the most
![]() ![]() |
![]() Administrator ![]()
|
The KDE Forums use phpBB.
KDE Sysadmin
[img]content/bcooksley_sig.png[/img] |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
I'm surprised that Chakra isn't nominated. Their's is the best KDE implementation out there. Vanilla with custom artwork.
![]() |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Ubuntu (currently 11.10, waiting to try 12.04 final release) + KDE 4.8 does it for me. Note that I am not running Kubuntu, I just apt-get'd KDE over a vanilla Ubuntu install. It makes my desktop feel somewhat more personal knowing no one has pre-configured it to send out in a mass distrobution
![]() |
![]() ![]()
|
Kubuntu, but customized. Rather than installing the distro as a whole, I install a base command-line Ubuntu and then follow with specific KDE packages from Kubuntu. I've posted my procedure at Kubuntu Forums: http://www.kubuntuforums.net/showthread.php?56552.
It needs a bit of updating for Precise. Also, I've switched Phonon's backend from GStreamer to VLC, and I need to incorporate that into the build documentation. http://www.kubuntuforums.net/showthread.php?57553 |
Registered users: bancha, Bing [Bot], Evergrowing, Google [Bot], lockheed, mesutakcan