![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Before I get into my rant: Don't get me wrong, KDE is really great. That's why I kept using it since KDE 2.x times and never moved to any other desktop. So, what's so good about KDE? Well, it looks cool for one. It's got great software like digikam, kstars, etc.
So what's not to like? Well, let me start by saying that I'm just a user. As a user, I don't really care why things don't work the way that would be ideal. I only notice that that's the case. And as a user, I have the impression that some aspects got worse over time. Let me give you some examples:
So why don't I start to work on some of the issues I mentioned? Simple. I'm just a user. I can't even code. I hope, people don't feel offended by my rant. It is not meant in any way to devalue your efforts. It is meant to give you some honest feedback and some positive suggestions on where to best direct your efforts from my (a user's) perspective. Keep up the good work! |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Konqueror is still there, even though the current version is still KDE4 based. But it has been ported to KDE Frameworks5 and will be KF5 based in KDE Applications 16.12. kjots is still available as well (in a KF5 version), and there's also knotes as a note taking app, both share the notes even. Only knode has been dropped. |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Cool, looking forward to have it back again. ![]()
I forgot to mention that I'm running Kubuntu 16.04. kjots isn't in its repositories any more. Maybe I should give Neon a try. What's holding me back is that I'm not sure whether it will have the same level of support for the non-core KDE apps (e.g. digikam, darktable, libreoffice, etc.) as I do get from Kubuntu. |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Well, then you should "complain" to your distribution. ![]() kjots has indeed been dropped in kdepim 15.08.0 (the first KF5 version), but the KF5 port has later been released separately. See https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-dist ... 00125.html And e.g. openSUSE does ship kjots 5.0.1 (and the KDE4 based konqueror, there's nothing that prevents running KDE4 applications in Plasma5).
AFAIK, neon is basically just an addon repo for the latest Ubuntu LTS release. I am not involved in neon though and never used it. |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Is there any music player, that syncs with baloo? If I rate a song, I'd like that to show up in other applications, e.g. dolphin, as well.
Amarok used to sync with Nepomuk, although that never worked well. Bangarang synced with baloo, but is apparently not supported any more. Is there an actively maintained alternative? |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Well, it doesn't actually have to sync with baloo at all. The ratings that dolphin shows/uses are stored in (more or less) standardized file attributes (xattrs). Baloo is just a file indexer (unlike Nepomuk), and it should reindex changed files in the configured folders automatically, but dolphin should show the ratings even for unindexed files IIANM. I cannot tell you whether there is a music player that supports those file attributes though. Amarok does have an option to write back tags to the actual files, but I don't know if that applies to the ratings too. Btw, regarding Konqueror as Web Browser: a webengine part for browsing has been added this weekend, so the upcoming KF5 based Konqueror can now use QtWebEngine (which is based on Chromium) as rendering engine too (in addition to KHTML and QtWebKit, the latter seems to be in active development again as well: http://qtwebkit.blogspot.co.at/). |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
I noticed an FMPS_RATING_AMAROK_SCORE tag on some of my music files. However, dolphin and Baloo don't seem to do anything with that. Clementine offers to write the ratings to the file tags. But then, it stores them as FMPS_RATING tags, which dolphin and Baloo again don't read. Why can't this be standardised? One tag label to hold the rating, which can be read and written by all software that deals with music meta data (tags). Same thing for play count and maybe the date and time when last played.
An up-to-date Web browser that fully integrates with the rest of the KDE world --> Great! Will it still also be a better file browser than dolphin (although the latter has been getting a bit better and more stable as of late)? |
![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
Baloo/Dolphin use extended file attributes for this, they don't store the rating inside the file (like media players do normally). Wouldn't work with most file types anyway: Most Multimedia file formats do support additional metadata inside the file (and that's what media players use), but what about text files e.g.? Adding metadata inside a text file (and actually most other non-multimedia file-types) will basically "break" it.
Konqueror uses an embedded dolphin for file browsing since 4.0. To be precise: Konqueror is neither a web browser, nor a file browser. It is just a shell for embedding other applications, so called "KParts". There is a KHTML part, a webkit part, and now a webengine part for web browsing, there's e.g. an okular-part for viewing documents (PDF e.g), and there is a dolphin-part for file browsing (since 4.0, before that Konqueror came with its own that got dropped in favor of just using dolphin). In theory, one could of course write a new file browsing kpart too, but what's the point. |
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]