This forum has been archived. All content is frozen. Please use KDE Discuss instead.

[SOLVED] Kate: alt now sends keyboard focus to the menubar

Tags: None
(comma "," separated)
luebking
Karma
0
Ah. For KDE4 applications ensure to set the style in "kcmshell4 style"
User avatar
sparhawk
Registered Member
Posts
433
Karma
0
OS
luebking wrote:Ah. For KDE4 applications ensure to set the style in "kcmshell4 style"

This seems to be the same settings that I access via the "normal" system settings. Options also persist between both types, and `kcmshell4 style` also doesn't persist in Dolphin.

My system settings already appear to be from KDE4.
Code: Select all
$ pacman -Qo $(which systemsettings)
/usr/bin/systemsettings is owned by kdebase-workspace 4.11.17-1
User avatar
sparhawk
Registered Member
Posts
433
Karma
0
OS
Okay, I've reported an "issue" with Qt here, although as you say, I'm not sure that it's something that they would change.

I've also tried patching Qt5-base and this fixes the problem for me. However, the package took two hours to build with 8 cores! In the future (for updates) is there an alternative way? I assume that the style files I patched were compiled into binaries? Is there a way I can upgrade with Arch's official Qt[45] binaries, while patching the cleanlooks or fusion styles from source and saving them elsewhere, without having to compile the entirety of Qt[45]?

Also, related to new Dolphin windows reverting their style, it seems I'm not the only one with this problem.
luebking
Karma
0
The core styles are built into libQt5Widgets - it's sufficient to build that (qtbase/src/widgets), you don't have to build all the other libs.
3rd party style of course build faster ;-)
User avatar
sparhawk
Registered Member
Posts
433
Karma
0
OS
Hm… it seems that building only part of Qt might prove difficult anyway. I'll look for third party styles sometime, then. As stated earlier, with the loss of oxygen-gtk, there's a bit of a gap for uniform themes, but I might have to hunt more when I finally move to Plasma 5. (I did check out Virtuality, but you are correct… it is quite a radical approach!)

Thanks once again for all your help.


Bookmarks



Who is online

Registered users: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]