Tried with webkit

I cannot say that i worry about webkit as apple has the needed resources to develop it.
I 'm worrying about our engine the khtml which has a very active development the last weeks !

Dimitrios wrote:I konqueror 4.6.5

html5 test (http://html5test.com/)
96 points and 9 bonus points

And now with konqueror 4.10.2:

97 points and 7 bonus points
out of a total of 500 points

Not a big difference since the 4.6.5 version ...

Dimitrios wrote:

Dimitrios wrote:I konqueror 4.6.5

html5 test (http://html5test.com/)
96 points and 9 bonus points

And now with konqueror 4.10.2:

97 points and 7 bonus points
out of a total of 500 points

Not a big difference since the 4.6.5 version ...

Now in KDE 4.11.4 i have 103 OUT OF 555 POINTS
It seems that konqueror needs some more care

I got the following scores for Konqueror on WebKit on html5test.com

QtWebKit 2.2.x (Slackware 14.0 and higher; Kubuntu 12.04, 12.10; openSUSE 12.2, 12.3; Debian Wheezy, Jessie, and Sid)
304 out of 555 when the flashplayer-plugin is installed, 299 without it. The difference is due to HTML5 local storage being enabled when flashplayer-plugin is installed. I tested on Slackware 14.1 and Kubuntu 12.04.

QtWebKit 2.3.x (Kubuntu 13.10, 14.04; openSUSE 13.1, factory; Fedora 19, 20, rawhide; Mageia 3, 4, cauldron; Arch)
405 out of 555. I tested on a live DVD of Fedora 20 KDE Spin.

QtWebKit has made some big progress in HTML5. However, the HTML5 score still trails Firefox 24esr by 31 points when tested with a WebGL app installed.

The following are the ECMAScript Language test262 scores at test262.ecmascript.org:
KHTML in KDE 4.10.5 4150 fails out of 11578
QtWebKit 2.2.x 940 fails
KHTML in KDE 4.11 & 4.12 896 fails
QtWebKit 2.3.x 4 fails

The KHTML score improved greatly in KDE 4.11. The WebKit score became almost perfect in QtWebKit 2.3. By, comparison the score in Firefox 27 is 43 fails.

I just installed openSUSE 13.1 on a USB hard drive with KDE 4.12. On the HTML5 test using QtWebKit, I got a 385 out of 555. The difference in the score with Fedora 20 is due to Fedora 20's live DVD including location and orientation support, which is not included in a default openSUSE KDE install.

After the fix of KDE Bug 335556 [Date() constructor treats time as UTC instead of localtime] in KDE 4.13.3, the ECMAScript Language test262 score in KHTML has improved by 8 to 888 fails out of 11,578.

After the revision of the Ecmascript language test 262 scores on September 17, 2014, here are the following number of fails out of 11,552 tests.

QtWebKit 2.3.x: 4
KHTML 4.13.3 to 4.14.2: 887
QtWebKit 2.2.x: 940

I indicate the percentage support of CSS3 elements at css3test.com .

QtWebKit 2.3.x: 55%
QtWebKit 2.2.x: 41%
KHTML 4.14.2: 18%

To compare, Firefox 33 is at 55%, and Firefox 31 esr is at 54%.

I built QtWebKIt 2.3.4 on both Slackware 14.1 and Debian 7 stable. I have a html5test.com score of 387 on Slackware and 385 on Debian. The only difference is that the kwebkitpart that I am using on Slackware has prefixed support for Input: Gamepad control. The css3test.com score on both operating systems is at 54%, The css3test.com score on KHTML is at 18% in KDE 4.8.4 and KDE 4.13.3.