Registered Member
|
1. Disable DHT on 2 torrents.
2. Enable DHT on first torrent. 3. Select both torrents. 4. Open pop-up menu of for both of them (rightclick on selection). On this step you can see DHT property checked in menu. 5. Remove DHT property (click to uncheck). 6. Deselect torrents. 7. Look at DHT property of both torrents. Awaited: DHT disabled for both. Actual: DHT disabled for first and enabled for second. For example in uTorrent when you select torrents with different DHT state you see grayed checker in properties window (in uTorrent DHT and bunch of other properties controlled from properties window). When you click on it -- checker removed, on second click there appear normal checker. When you change DHT checker and click OK this property replaced for all selected torrents. Not inverted but replaced by same value. When you select many torrents and want to enable DHT for all of them you never know is some of them already have this property and you lose DHT on them. I think we need to replace 2-state checkers in menu with 3-state and show third state when selected group of torrents with different state of parameter. When user click it first time kTorrent will replace parameter for whole selected group on disabled. Parameter, which will be fixed: 1. DHT 2. Peer Exchange 3. Enqueue/Dequeue (Now we even don't know from menu is torrent queued or not. What we change if we don't know current state???) I think Enqueue/Dequeue position should be replaced by Queued property with 3-state checker on the left.
What isn`t remembered never happened. Memory is merely a record. You just need to rewrite that record.
|
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Registered Member
|
I get latest SVN 910286 and still have this issue.
Also there is still no difference between queued torrent and not queued if we don't open queue manager. If we have ability to control queue from menu then displaying queued state of torrent good idea.
What isn`t remembered never happened. Memory is merely a record. You just need to rewrite that record.
|
Registered Member
|
SVN 911634.
Huh. Now they disabled. So, no more any ability to control them all at once? It is not so good. Maybe replacing for all better then disabling? As I mentioned before in uTorrent implemented replacing and I think they right.
What isn`t remembered never happened. Memory is merely a record. You just need to rewrite that record.
|
Moderator
|
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], q.ignora, watchstar