This forum has been archived. All content is frozen. Please use KDE Discuss instead.

Feature request: make "Max seeds" count only active uploads

Tags: None
(comma "," separated)
imported4-rihad
Registered Member
Posts
19
Karma
0
Hi, the subject pretty much says it all. It would be nice if only the number of torrents being actively uploaded at any given time counted towards the Max seeds limit, not including the number of torrents awaiting for someone to download them.
George
Moderator
Posts
5421
Karma
1
rihad wrote:Hi, the subject pretty much says it all. It would be nice if only the number of torrents being actively uploaded at any given time counted towards the Max seeds limit, not including the number of torrents awaiting for someone to download them.


Why not just use the feature to decrease the priority of torrents if they become inactive for too long ?
imported4-rihad
Registered Member
Posts
19
Karma
0
George wrote:Why not just use the feature to decrease the priority of torrents if they become inactive for too long ?

You mean the "Decrease priority of torrents which are stalled for too long" checkbox? I never thought of it, thanks.
But still I'd like to lower the load on the computer. 10-20 simultaneous seeds (multiplied by several upload channels per torrent) is hardly something an average desktop HDD is designed to do. So I'd like to limit that to 5 torrents, BUT setting max seeds to 5 having 50 torrents on the upload queue might not be optimal, because only 5 out of 50 would be allowed to the outside world, the rest would be put on hold. See what I mean?
George
Moderator
Posts
5421
Karma
1
I fail to see the difference, between running 5 torrents, and running 20 torrents and only allowing uploads on 5 of them.
imported4-rihad
Registered Member
Posts
19
Karma
0
Let me put it this way: 5 torrents out of 20 are more likely to be actively uploaded at any given time than 5 torrents out of 5. Frankly, the checkbox you mentioned goes a long way toward doing almost the same thing by mangling the priorities, although it is prone to time lags.


Bookmarks



Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], daret, Google [Bot], sandyvee, Sogou [Bot]