Registered Member
|
I mean. All modern desktops are trying to remove every useless space on the UI in order to make the user experience better, specially on small screens with lower resolutions.
On my 15.6" laptop that border takes a big portion of the screen just for 3 buttons. If you also add the size of the taskbar the remaining usable screen feels smaller than it should be. I know you can hide the taskbar or hide the window borders when they are maximized but you have to be tweaking the system for everything you do. Wouldn't it be a better idea to use another approach like Gnome Shell/Mac OS X where the 3 buttons are embedded into the application header along with other options. |
Registered Member
|
The window decoration? Ken blogged about using a CSD kind of thing (https://kver.wordpress.com/2014/10/25/p ... corations/). And I swear there is a thread here but I don't remember it's title.
Last edited by Uri_Herrera on Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Registered Member
|
Thank you for your answer.
I knew about these posts but all them are from a developer view, at least the ones I read we're made by developers for developers. I just wanted to talk about this from another perspective, like designers or end users. |
Registered Member
|
but you can change the border height to smaller size.
|
Registered Member
|
Three buttons *and* the window title. http://wstaw.org/m/2015/10/04/plasma-desktopxe3846.png Personnally, I don't find it such a waste of space ... |
Registered Member
|
I'm certainly not a developer, I don't find the default decoration to use a lot of space and I have a netbook with an even smaller screen size than you (10" 1024x600). You can also change the size of the decoration in system settings. I don't know if the feature was added recently or if it had been there already. |
Registered users: bancha, Bing [Bot], Evergrowing, Google [Bot], lockheed, mesutakcan