![]() Registered Member ![]()
|
It seems to me that "activities" are the same as what virtual desktops used to be? Is there any reason to use virtual desktops anymore if you use activities?
Any thoughts are appreciated ![]() David
Last edited by daviddoria on Sun Nov 27, 2011 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
![]() Administrator ![]()
|
See viewtopic.php?f=67&t=93183, in particular the two links at the bottom of the list.
In short: no. I personally see activities as "higher in hierarchy" than virtual desktops, they provide a way for me to separate my computer activities. However, I still use virtual desktop to organize windows within an activity.
Problem solved? Please click on "Accept this answer" below the post with the best answer to mark your topic as solved.
10 things you might want to do in KDE | Open menu with Super key | Mouse shortcuts |
![]() Manager ![]()
|
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], kde-naveen, Sogou [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]