This forum has been archived. All content is frozen. Please use KDE Discuss instead.

Matrix multiplication VERY slow...

Tags: None
(comma "," separated)
rachelp
Registered Member
Posts
2
Karma
0

Matrix multiplication VERY slow...

Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:40 pm
Hi,

I've only been working with Eigen for a couple weeks and I'm also fairly new to coding in general. I'm working on a program which will use fairly large matrices and vectors (anywhere from 50 to 1000+ rows and columns). Most of my code runs very fast but the the small portion of my code that I've copied below runs very slowly. When the matrices are small ( < 15 x 15) the multiplication takes about a minute or two to compute, but when the matrices are larger ( > 40 x 40) it takes an hour if not much, much longer to compute.


float b_eta;
MatrixXd I, K, M, tempmat;
VectorXd eta;

tempmat = eta.transpose() * (I.setIdentity() - K * M * K.transpose()) * eta;
float b_eta_p = b_eta + 0.5 * tempmat(0,0);

The above I found is just slightly faster than:
float b_eta_p = b_eta + 0.5 * eta.transpose() * (I.setIdentity() - K * M * K.transpose()) * eta;

Is there a better way I can write out this multiplication so that it computes faster? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
User avatar
ggael
Moderator
Posts
3447
Karma
19
OS
How many times are you executing this expression? Even for 1000^2 matrices it should take less than a second. Make sure optimizations are on (e.g., -O2). Which compiler? Which CPU?

Finally you can significantly reduce the number of operations by performing matrix-vector products only, instead of matrix-matrix products, e.g.:

VectorXf tmp = K.transpose() * eta;
b_eta_p = b_eta + 0.5*(eta.squaredNorm() - tmp.dot(M*tmp));
rachelp
Registered Member
Posts
2
Karma
0
ggael wrote:How many times are you executing this expression? Even for 1000^2 matrices it should take less than a second. Make sure optimizations are on (e.g., -O2). Which compiler? Which CPU?

Finally you can significantly reduce the number of operations by performing matrix-vector products only, instead of matrix-matrix products, e.g.:

VectorXf tmp = K.transpose() * eta;
b_eta_p = b_eta + 0.5*(eta.squaredNorm() - tmp.dot(M*tmp));


Thanks very much for your help! The expression is only executed once, and optimizations were on. Your suggestion of performing only matrix-vector products helped a lot though and it now runs much much much faster.


Bookmarks



Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Sogou [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]