[KIO] Replace KIO by tight FUSE integration

VestniK Registered Member Posts 4 Karma 0 OS

[KIO] Replace KIO by tight FUSE integration Sat Apr 27, 2013 5:55 am FUSE user and developrs base is bigger then KIO supports a lot of different protocols it allows to access files from any application works on a lot of OSes Benefits for KDE: any application can work with a file you can see in dolphin support of a lot VFS not handled by KIO (for example: viewtopic.php?f=83&t=98153&p=316765 ) less KDE programmers time needed to support VFS protocols Benifits for FOSS comunity: less duplicated work more improvements into single tool doing great job for all Why I don't like tis proposal viewtopic.php?f=95&t=51830 and KioFuse mentioned there: necessity to have 2 tools doing the same and a bridge to connect them overcomplicated chain from data to programm: protocol X -> XKioSlave -> KIO -> KioFuse -> FUSE -> app instead of protocol X -> XFuseModule -> FUSE -> app

Bookmarks

Who is online

Registered users: Bing [Bot], claydoh, Google [Bot], rblackwell, Yahoo [Bot]