Registered Member
|
On ancient times krunner (or may I say the alt+f2 shortcut) was only able to run commands. Now a days, it has become more than that. Sadly, it is missing some usability. Gnome-do is a good example (although far for perfect).
What I think is missing.
So a normal query flow would be:
|
Registered Member
|
Clearing input with Esc sounds very nice, I think everything else is possible in 4.3 though
|
Registered Member
|
afaik switching result by hitting tab does work. and why do you think that "accept with enter" is missing?
NoobSaibot, proud to be a member of KDE forums since 2008-Oct.
|
Global Moderator
|
Switching with tab switches to the buttons instead of straight back to the input field from the results - which I find very annoying.
Moult, proud to be a member of KDE forums since 2008-Oct.
thinkMoult - source for tech, art, and animation: hilarity and interest ensured! WIPUP.org - a unique system to share, critique and track your works-in-progress projects. |
Registered Member
|
This reminds me, are there any new plugins with 4.3?
Dante Ashton, in the KDE Community since 2008-Nov.
-Artificial Intelligence Specialist. |
Registered Member
|
Just use shift+tab. Really the only things that are not present already are 1 and 2.
Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
-NASA in 1965 |
Registered Member
|
@NoobSaibot
Oops. Your right, my mistake. @TheBlackCat Your right, tab switches to results and shift+tab switches back but it also scrolls through the results. I think the main 2 ideas are
I will demonstrate why is this so bad for usability with an example that hopefully everyone can reproduce:
Now with a calculation
As you can see, in the first example I would save around 10 to 15 keystrokes. On the second around 4 OR 2 depending on your method. Hope I have explained my self better. |
Registered Member
|
I think the first is fine, but I really do not want the second. This is why we like people to break up their ideas into separate posts.
Or:
Once again, you could hit esc and start over. Also, if you hit ctrl+a you don't have to hit del, you can just start typing.
I count a minimum of 4 in the first case and 1 in the second. I think a better solution from re-mapping the function of the tab key would be for the focus to automatically return to the input field when you start typing again. So in your first case all you would have to do is starting typing on the keyboard and what you type is automatically added to the end of "kde". That would save two keystrokes compared to your example.
Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
-NASA in 1965 |
Registered Member
|
Sorry, but I think usability must be expressed as a flow of actions. By popular demand I could split this thread in to 2 or 3 as required, but the main focus is to improve the overall usability.
What if instead of clearing you just wanted to add the word "forum" to get i.e. the kde forum's bookmark The fact that closing (hiding) an app to clear the query box is one of the "fastest" way to do it demonstrates its awful usability. It is already very misguiding not to know the exact number of hits as an estimate of the query success. This means that in any given query you would either repeat the above suggested work-flow until the desired hit appeared on the visible results or, scroll up and down the results until the target is reached or choice is made to change query.
I think you came up with an even better solution Gotta love KDE's forums. What about the proposed hit counter? Would it make people queries faster/more efficient? |
Registered Member
|
Not everyone has the same opinions about what would improve usability and what would hurt it. That is why each of your ideas should be posted separately, so people can express their opinion on each of those ideas. If you force me to pick, I would have to vote this idea down because the loss of usability to me from changing the tab button behavior would far outweigh any gain from the esc button behavior. I rarely clear the krunner box, but forcing me to switch buttons when focus changes from the text box to the runner list would be a huge hassle for me.
You could re-type it, it is only 3 characters.
I'm not arguing against the esc button idea, I am just pointing out there is an easier way to do it currently.
I personally like it, but it is another idea that should be in a separate thread so people can vote on it separately.
Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
-NASA in 1965 |
Registered Member
|
If I might say my opinion
Results in krunner is ONE single input field just the same as text box any any other input. Tab in forms is used to jump between input fields, (not within data in them). Take a look at web. Dropdowns/ select boxes ( |
Registered Member
|
Unless it is optional I don't like it. I can clear a field with other methods and don't like to hit Esc twice to close the window.
Do not try this at home, part 1. Second most favorite command after KDE upgrade: # chmod -x /usr/bin/kactivitymanagerd
|
Registered Member
|
May I ask what other methods? are they simpler/more efficient? You must hit esc twice only if there is text on the query box. If not, just once will be sufficient. In amarok, after Celeste's excellent usability study, esc is also the default to clear the query field. Using esc would be excellent for consistency throughout kde |
Registered Member
|
I'm often using krunner. And most of the time I close it when it has something there not when it is empty. There is ctrl + A shortcut to select all text so you can write over removing previously typed text.
Do not try this at home, part 1. Second most favorite command after KDE upgrade: # chmod -x /usr/bin/kactivitymanagerd
|
Registered Member
|
Thanks for the reply, I was just curious. However, why would you close it most of the time? this only makes sense when you are using the calculator or the unit converter krunner. For all the other krunners (~80%) the work-flow "should" end in an enter key stroke. |
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]