Registered Member
|
Nowadays, as web components are easily integrated to any kde app, or so I have understood, would it be possible to make parts of user interfaces of conventional apps with "web technologies" (of which I have little knowledge) and show them with KDEWebkit. In short, we would have a web page that resides in local folder and which shows data of local folders instead of a web page.
This idea occurred me as I had been using Greader (Google reader) for a while and switched back to Akregator. Although I like and prefer using Akregator I had grew fond of dynamic interface of Greader. For example, marking a post important and showing details of a post in place are features I like. So what I'm proposing here, is to change part of Akregator which shows feed topics to a local webpage. That's one example, I'm sure others come up with more ideas. Benefits of which I can think of are *more dynamic and graphic interfaces (maybe possible otherwise too but not that much used.) *(easily?) customizable and themeable *not everything have to be so square and traditional *this could be alternative, I'm quite sure that, for example, in Akregator conventional and webkit interfaces could be interchangeable in runtime. Good idea? Old? Is this even possible? |
Registered Member
|
|
Registered Member
|
I actually like it when my user interfaces are consistent...
And also, Qt is actually pretty powerful and actually more flexible than a webpage could be. It's just that someone actually have to take the time and write up a better user interface for the application.
Get problems solved faster - get reply notifications through Jabber!
|
Registered Member
|
Also, read this: Side effects of using QtWebKit for desktop apps.
Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor.
-NASA in 1965 |
Registered Member
|
Thanks for commenting. All good points. I suppose we can bury this idea then.
|
KDE Developer
|
Qt has great theming functions. And now compare the interface of Firefox-Addons (that is XUL, more powerful than HTML, e.g. FireFTP or the Chat-Clients) with the interface of Kopete or Konqueror: The interface of Kopete and Konqueror was written in C++. But for the user they provide much more flexibility: You can drag everything around etc. With HTML and JS this is only possible with a huge overhead.
When you want to have dynamic interfaces, Qt's .ui-features should be used. |
Registered users: Bing [Bot], daret, Google [Bot], sandyvee, Sogou [Bot]